<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org">
<title>Screen - current issue</title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org</link>
<description>Screen - RSS feed of current issue</description>
<prism:eIssn>1460-2474</prism:eIssn>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Summer 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Screen</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0036-9543</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/123?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/142?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/157?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/179?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/194?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/203?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/209?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/216?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/228?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/234?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/237?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/242?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/246?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/255?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/257?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/123?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA['It's all there, it's no dream': Vertigo and the redemptive pleasures of the cinephilic pilgrimage]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/123?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>What is a cinephilic pilgrimage? Is it simply a journey to a place featured in a favourite film? Or does the journey have deeper spiritual and phenomenological dimensions?</p>
<p><I>Vertigo</I> (Alfred Hitchcock, 1958) offers the best definition: a cinephilic pilgrimage resembles Madeleine's purported visits to Golden Gate Park's &lsquo;Portals of the Past&rsquo; monument, a remnant of Old San Francisco that serves as the site of her psychic transformation to &ndash; and/or possession by &ndash; the film's avatar of <I>Alta California</I>, Carlotta Valdes. During these visits, Madeleine allegedly connects with a colonial-era narrative by staring across Lake Lloyd at the monument &lsquo;on the far side&rsquo;.</p>
<p>Similarly, in their pilgrimages, cinephiles attempt to reify (that is, ground within the real) an inherently ephemeral experience of the past while, at the same time, utilizing real spaces as &lsquo;portals&rsquo; through which to once again access, personally experience, and even occupy, that past. However, just as Scottie learns that Judy can never match the Madeleine of his memory, cinephilic pilgrims soon discover that the real cannot live up to the image. The &lsquo;Spiral of Time&rsquo; (mentioned by Chris Marker in <I>Sans Soleil</I> (1983), urban erasure, lack of affective context and lack of framing all contribute to the inadequacy of the real in the face of expectations derived from cinematic memory. In order to occupy and control the space of possibility and meaning (a phenomenon Siegfried Kracauer refers to as &lsquo;psychophysical correspondence&rsquo;), the cinephilic pilgrim must exercise creative agency; only then can the cinephile redeem both the real and the image.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cunningham, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA['It's all there, it's no dream': Vertigo and the redemptive pleasures of the cinephilic pilgrimage]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>141</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/142?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A century of electronic cinema]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/142?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The prospect of the electronic distribution and exhibition of theatrical motion pictures has provoked fearful, even apocalyptic, warnings from some in the contemporary Hollywood industry. While the immediate prospects for, and consequences of, the end of celluloid-based exhibition are unclear, the shift to digital cinema has already complicated some of the fundamental business models, industry practices, and power relations within the film and television industries. Digital exhibition has inspired some filmmakers and industry observers to imagine an industry less dominated by the major studios, with new untraditional venues for exhibition, and new opportunities for exhibitors to contract directly with filmmakers and develop alternative programming and uses for traditional public cinemas, including sporting events, music concerts, business conferencing, and video gaming. At the same time, electronic cinema has encouraged the growth of in-cinema advertising and has threatened the long-established practice of staggered release dates across the theatrical and domestic exhibition markets, and some in the motion picture industry worry that electronic cinema will collapse the distinct aesthetic forms and audience practices of domestic television and public cinema-going. Electronic cinema's prospective confounding of traditionally distinct business models, textual forms, and viewing protocols has not been fully taken on board by media scholars, and the current proliferation of technological platforms, business models, and viewing practices related to the consumption of moving images beyond the domestic space of traditional television will have profound implications for the objects and methods of study in our discipline.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Boddy, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn022</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A century of electronic cinema]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>156</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>142</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/157?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Spectacle/gender/history: the case of Gone with the Wind]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/157?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The essay asserts that, since pioneering work in the 1970s and 80s (in <I>Screen</I> in particular), the study of classical Hollywood cinema has failed adequately to acknowledge and understand the role of spectacle therein. This essay outlines theoretical but, even more, practical understandings of particular kinds of spectacle; they are susceptible to the practice of close analysis. Seeking to discuss spectacle in precise terms and in particular contexts, I define two kinds of spectacle associated with the historical film: &lsquo;the decor of history&rsquo; and &lsquo;the spectacular vista&rsquo;.</p>
<p>The example of <I>Gone with the Wind</I> illustrates the interrelationship between these two kinds of spectacle and their associations with particular ideas of femininity and masculinity. This gendering of spectacle is related to &lsquo;the historical gaze&rsquo;, a performative gesture that exemplifies the wider rhetoric of historical films, in their seeking to address the historical knowledge of the film spectator and to uphold a vision of history as being driven by powerful men, aware of their own destiny. Over the course of the three famous hilltop scenes in <I>Gone with the Wind</I>, one can plot Scarlett O'Hara's increased access to this kind of foresight and fortitude coded as &lsquo;masculine&rsquo;. This character arc can also be traced through Scarlett's shifting place within the film's use of spectacle: she begins the film wholly preoccupied with the domestic world of lavish parties and beautiful gowns; however, after her encounter with cataclysmic history visualized as a vast, terrible spectacle (the fall of Atlanta), Scarlett assumes the role occupied by her broken and emasculated father.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brown, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn023</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Spectacle/gender/history: the case of Gone with the Wind]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>178</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>157</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/179?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Maximum movies: Lawrence Alloway's pop art film criticism]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/179?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>During the 1950s and 1960s, the art critic Lawrence Alloway (1926&ndash;1990) began to articulate a theory of the movies that gave equal weight to the industrial processes of production, creative collaboration, and the specialized knowledge that audiences brought to the movies. The emphasis on film cycles, rather than the discrete film, or genre defined in terms of an ideal, enabled a content analysis that valued uniqueness <I>and</I> convention. Alloway showed how this could be profitably linked to the social and cultural consumption of film &ndash; a film analysis that recognised a symbiotic loop between producer, distributor, exhibitor, critic and audience. This essay examines Alloway's research into the movies' articulation of regular modification and ephemeral impressions, and as the source and the expression of an expendable series of icons. His insights into postwar film cycles and the intensification of conventions grew out of his seminal criticism on pop art and his role in the Independent Group, a loose-knit collective of artists and intellectuals who met at the Institute of Contemporary Arts in London during the early to mid-1950s.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stanfield, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn032</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Maximum movies: Lawrence Alloway's pop art film criticism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>193</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>179</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/194?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Expanding the frame: Sally Potter's digital histories and archival futures]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/194?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mayer, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn028</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Expanding the frame: Sally Potter's digital histories and archival futures]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>202</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>194</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Experimental feminist film dossier</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/203?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Of other worlds: nature and the supernatural in the moving image installations of Jaki Irvine]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/203?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connolly, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn024</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Of other worlds: nature and the supernatural in the moving image installations of Jaki Irvine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>208</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>203</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Experimental feminist film dossier</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/209?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lip and Love: subversive repetition in the pastiche films of Tracey Moffatt]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/209?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn031</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Lip and Love: subversive repetition in the pastiche films of Tracey Moffatt]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>215</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>209</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Experimental feminist film dossier</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/216?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Stalking the image: Margaret Tait and intimate filmmaking practices]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/216?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neely, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn029</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Stalking the image: Margaret Tait and intimate filmmaking practices]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>221</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>216</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Experimental feminist film dossier</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Filmosophy * The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rushton, R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn030</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Filmosophy * The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/228?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hollywood Asian: Philip Ahn and the Politics of Cross-Ethnic Performance * Sessue Hayakawa: Silent Cinema and Transnational Stardom]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/228?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phillips, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn020</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hollywood Asian: Philip Ahn and the Politics of Cross-Ethnic Performance * Sessue Hayakawa: Silent Cinema and Transnational Stardom]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>233</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>228</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/234?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Projected Shadows: Psychoanalytic Reflections on the Representation of Loss in European Cinema]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/234?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wilson, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn033</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Projected Shadows: Psychoanalytic Reflections on the Representation of Loss in European Cinema]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>236</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>234</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/237?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Chinese Documentaries: from Dogma to Polyphony * Sinascape: Contemporary Chinese Cinema]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/237?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn034</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Chinese Documentaries: from Dogma to Polyphony * Sinascape: Contemporary Chinese Cinema]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>241</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>237</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/242?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Religion and Film * Cinema Divinite]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/242?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ortiz, G. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Religion and Film * Cinema Divinite]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>245</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>242</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/246?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Restyling Factual TV: Audiences and News, Documentary and Reality Genres]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/246?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Holmes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn027</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Restyling Factual TV: Audiences and News, Documentary and Reality Genres]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>249</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>246</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/250?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Gothic Television]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/250?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Butler, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Gothic Television]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>254</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>250</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>reviews</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/255?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Contributors]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/255?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn021</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Contributors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>255</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Contributors</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/257?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Notes to Contributors]]></title>
<link>http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/short/49/2/257?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-10</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1093/screen/hjn035</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Notes to Contributors]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>John Logie Baird Centre</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>2</prism:number>
<prism:volume>49</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>257</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>257</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Notes to Contributors</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>